|
Post by gothamknight1992 on Feb 13, 2009 19:39:23 GMT -5
Which movie do you prefer the first Batman movie or the first Bond film? I prefer Dr. No because to me it was more fun to watch and Sean Connery embodied James Bond the same way Christopher Reeve embodied Superman.
|
|
|
Post by Batlaw on Feb 14, 2009 10:20:37 GMT -5
Well since Im not exactly much of a Bond fan and cant say for certain Ive ever even seen Dr. No(?), I say Batman '89. I think its holding up really well.
|
|
|
Post by gothamknight1992 on Feb 14, 2009 12:43:48 GMT -5
Well since Im not exactly much of a Bond fan and cant say for certain Ive ever even seen Dr. No(?), I say Batman '89. I think its holding up really well. You should buy Dr. No it's only ten bucks at Amazon.com if you buy the single disc version instead of the two disc special edition.
|
|
|
Post by Eric on Feb 14, 2009 12:48:35 GMT -5
Batman.
However I do love the original Bond films. I watch them whenever theres a TV marathon on.
|
|
|
Post by BruceBatman on Feb 14, 2009 21:19:24 GMT -5
Um, do I even need to say this, I think everybody on this forum can honestly say Batman. lol
|
|
|
Post by gothamknight1992 on Feb 15, 2009 16:00:21 GMT -5
Um, do I even need to say this, I think everybody on this forum can honestly say Batman. lol Blah blah blah.
|
|
|
Post by blackraven87 on Feb 16, 2009 14:40:16 GMT -5
I love Bond, but I'd have to say Batman. Just cause, and Dr No's never been a favorite of mine. I like it, but it just isn't a fav.
|
|
|
Post by gothamknight1992 on Feb 17, 2009 20:12:56 GMT -5
I love Bond, but I'd have to say Batman. Just cause, and Dr No's never been a favorite of mine. I like it, but it just isn't a fav. I guess the first Batman film was decent but it didn't leave a lot of room for a sequel that's why Batman Returns (1992) simply pales in comparison to the original. Dr No on the other hand actually left room for a sequel and what a sequel that was.
|
|
|
Post by blackraven87 on Feb 17, 2009 23:07:46 GMT -5
I guess the first Batman film was decent but it didn't leave a lot of room for a sequel that's why Batman Returns (1992) simply pales in comparison to the original. Dr No on the other hand actually left room for a sequel and what a sequel that was. I suppose though I love it too. I do agree it doesn't compare. I started to think after I posted and perhaps I love No more than I thought. Still, stick with Batman over it. I need to see From Russia With Love again. I need to see ALL the films again!
|
|
Slash
Legions Of Gothamite
The REAL Batman
Posts: 55
|
Post by Slash on Feb 24, 2009 17:51:00 GMT -5
I prefer Batman because Michael Keaton embodies Batman... better than anyone I've seen!
|
|
|
Post by gothamknight1992 on Jun 14, 2009 23:01:35 GMT -5
I prefer Batman because Michael Keaton embodies Batman... better than anyone I've seen! I think Kevin Conroy embodies Batman but I suppose animation is easily dismissible huh?
|
|
|
Post by havedunter74 on Aug 12, 2009 9:34:56 GMT -5
How can you compare a film thats 20 years old and a film thats 40 odd years old. it seems such a strange comparison.
Maybe you could ask which do you prefer Spiderman (Sam Raimi's version) or Batman? Which one will stand the test of time?
Id say Batman as its still exciting after 20 years, Spiderman got boring after the first time
|
|