Dorian Mimes
Legions Of Gothamite
We Came, We Saw, We Kicked Their Asses!
Posts: 79
|
Hush?
Oct 13, 2008 9:30:21 GMT -5
Post by Dorian Mimes on Oct 13, 2008 9:30:21 GMT -5
difficult but not impossible. the dark knight was not perfect and could definitely be improved on. I have to completely agree with ya! TDk - in all it's aweosme and once I got some distance away form it (after watching it ohhh about several plus times), still has it's flaws. It's not entirely impossible and could work. And another thing I have to agree on is - I think Hush is too "brand spankin new". I do like him - I think the idea is good - but - maybe for a FUTURE movie aye? And I have been hearing some slight rumors going around - saying they're making a third one and Riddler is going to be in it - and guess whose rumored to play him? JOHNNY DEPP! Now ain't that something to ponder on! I also have been hearing people want to put Harley Quinn on the silver screen and to this I (sadly) say NAY! I love Harley - with all my heart and SOUL - but - you just can't have a Harley without a Joker. And seeing Heath's passing (we'll miss you) - it just - really can't happen. >_<
|
|
mr. battastic
Legions of Gotham Police Officer
Eat floor.... high fiber
Posts: 124
|
Hush?
Oct 15, 2008 17:43:22 GMT -5
Post by mr. battastic on Oct 15, 2008 17:43:22 GMT -5
i hope thats the case. one of the emphasis on the movie was batman has only one limitation and it was never take a life. so killing two face would kind of let the joker win that argument. as far as hush goes i admit id never heard of him till bout a year ago. so i think it'd be a good idea to introduce him in a film first to get the back story before involving him as a major villain in the films.
|
|
|
Hush?
Oct 16, 2008 17:51:26 GMT -5
Post by Batlaw on Oct 16, 2008 17:51:26 GMT -5
Dont care much for Hush as charecter in general... let alone for a movie.
|
|
|
Hush?
Nov 12, 2008 4:53:35 GMT -5
Post by kilowog52 on Nov 12, 2008 4:53:35 GMT -5
Hush is a big name but I don't thing he's appeared in any more than three story arcs.
|
|
|
Hush?
Nov 22, 2008 10:20:25 GMT -5
Post by svengali1337 on Nov 22, 2008 10:20:25 GMT -5
I'm just going to say something about the hole Two-face dead thing. It is true that two-face did die. You can download the script or screenplay or whatever its called online. At the end of it, it says (Two-face falls from building, breaks neck, dies) I personally doubt we will see him in the next film.
|
|
|
Hush?
Apr 14, 2009 5:36:31 GMT -5
Post by zack138 on Apr 14, 2009 5:36:31 GMT -5
I would rather they go ahead with what Goyer said and create a character just for the films, before using Hush. The character just doesnt really bring anything new to the franchise. Really the main thing he was used for in the books is that he knew Bruce as a child and somthing like that has already been portryaed with Rachel's character. Respectfully I think that you couldn't be more wrong. Hush would bring a completely fresh take to the series. With bringing in Hush, you bring in someone who not only knows Bruce Wayne and has a huge hatred for him, but is in many ways on par with Bruce as far as physical strength and being an intellectual goes. With the Joker in the Dark Knight, it really came across as a game for the Joker, because without the Batman the Joker would have no one to play with and would really be quite bored. But with Hush is a personal vendetta, he really wants to see Batman pay and wouldn't want to carry things out like the Joker did, but rather just see Bruce destroyed. I think Batman would really have his handful with Hush because he wouldn't be so easy to outsmart, and it would be harder to hurt him because he was a childhood friend and would pity him. Also I think Hush could easily play on the fact that Batman is on the run and could easily turn the city completely against him and really blur the lines of who the true hero/villain is. But that's just my opinion.
|
|
Doomsday
Legions of Gotham Police Officer
Y'wanna know how I got these scars?
Posts: 234
|
Hush?
Apr 14, 2009 9:09:17 GMT -5
Post by Doomsday on Apr 14, 2009 9:09:17 GMT -5
I would rather they go ahead with what Goyer said and create a character just for the films, before using Hush. The character just doesnt really bring anything new to the franchise. Really the main thing he was used for in the books is that he knew Bruce as a child and somthing like that has already been portryaed with Rachel's character. Respectfully I think that you couldn't be more wrong. Hush would bring a completely fresh take to the series. With bringing in Hush, you bring in someone who not only knows Bruce Wayne and has a huge hatred for him, but is in many ways on par with Bruce as far as physical strength and being an intellectual goes. With the Joker in the Dark Knight, it really came across as a game for the Joker, because without the Batman the Joker would have no one to play with and would really be quite bored. But with Hush is a personal vendetta, he really wants to see Batman pay and wouldn't want to carry things out like the Joker did, but rather just see Bruce destroyed. I think Batman would really have his handful with Hush because he wouldn't be so easy to outsmart, and it would be harder to hurt him because he was a childhood friend and would pity him. Also I think Hush could easily play on the fact that Batman is on the run and could easily turn the city completely against him and really blur the lines of who the true hero/villain is. But that's just my opinion. Spoken like a king.
|
|
|
Hush?
May 11, 2009 0:01:47 GMT -5
Post by Ralph Nigma on May 11, 2009 0:01:47 GMT -5
Hush always seemed to me to be doing very Bane-ish stuff. using all of the rogues against Batman, knowing who Batman really is, taking Batman's existence very personally, almost surgically deconstructing the dark knight. If you're looking for a story like that, I say Bane is probably a better way to go. He's got much more history and it's about time he was done well on screen.
Although, personally, neither would be my first choice. Hush is one of my least favorite villains.
|
|