|
|
Post by Batrez on Sept 28, 2005 22:45:22 GMT -5
I read gotham knights..and it confirmed that it was clayface who was improsanting him to make bruce get off his tracks...man, please someone get another writer on this comic..  |
|
|
|
Post by HUSH on Sept 29, 2005 3:02:41 GMT -5
I don't believe it. After all, Hush was talking to the chained up Tommy as a prisoner in private in GK #60. Just the two of them. To whoever wrote this new development, I ask: why would he be talking to Clayface, like he was Tommy, in PRIVATE?! I still think Hush is Harvey Dent. I disregard all this Gotham Knights BS. There are enough clues in HUSH to support him not being Tommy, like when Harold was about to tell Batman who Hush was, and then Hush shot him, only to lead him to believe minutes later that he is Tommy. Why wouldn't he just have let Harold tell him, instead of wasting bullets on him, just to tell Batman minutes later? Also, there's the fact that, also in the finale of HUSH, Hush wouldn't let Batman remove his bandages. If he was Tommy, then Batman already new his secret identity, why go to the trouble of hiding it? I strongly believe that Loeb was planning on doing a sequel in which Hush's true identity would be revealed, but things came up, and now it will never happen, so apparently Gotham Knights is free to screw around with his work as much as the writers want.  Sorry for being so critical, I just see this GK business as desecration of a great work. |
|
|
|
Post by /\/\att on Sept 29, 2005 3:07:23 GMT -5
I agree with you Hush. This GK arc ended up being a travesty of nature!
Hush is Harvey..I fully believe that as well. This clayface bit is getting way overused.
I hope DC gets off their butts and defines this character once and for all! The mystery was fun...but now we need to figure it out!
|
|
|
|
Post by HUSH on Sept 29, 2005 3:11:59 GMT -5
Thank you, /\/\att, here's a hero for that. It's been said again and again that the Clayface plot device is getting out of hand, but apparently the ease of using it instead of thinking up creative reasoning is spoiling the writers... |
|
|
|
Post by Batrez on Sept 29, 2005 14:20:11 GMT -5
just read the latest gotham knights..ull understand how hush is thinking. I agree with u guys that they drop the ball on this one. ANd guess whos back in catwoman...Hugo strange!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Batrez on Sept 30, 2005 23:59:06 GMT -5
could any of u guys explain where did harvey l ::)earn surgical skills???
|
|
|
|
Post by HUSH on Oct 1, 2005 2:41:36 GMT -5
could any of u guys explain where did harvey l ::)earn surgical skills??? Well, believe that Tommy, master surgeon that he is, performed the surgery on him, probably as his prisoner.  |
|
|
|
Post by All Star Batman on Oct 18, 2005 20:59:05 GMT -5
They are realy milking Hush on Gotham Knights. In the December preview, I thought that they were starting a new story. But in the January preview, they say Joker is going after Hush because the last time we saw Joker, Hush beat the s#!t out of him. THE LAST TIME WE SAW JOKER WAS DURING WAR CRIMES DC! Who's writing this title?
|
|
|
|
Post by reideen1313 on Oct 18, 2005 21:59:52 GMT -5
They are realy milking Hush on Gotham Knights. In the December preview, I thought that they were starting a new story. But in the January preview, they say Joker is going after Hush because the last time we saw Joker, Hush beat the s#!t out of him. THE LAST TIME WE SAW JOKER WAS DURING WAR CRIMES DC! Who's writing this title? Maybe Joker will appear between now and January. There is this big cross over going on right now in the DCU y'know...I doubt that we won't at least see Mr J & Hush at some point during the Crisis. |
|
|
|
Post by jlavaia on Oct 20, 2005 14:00:34 GMT -5
but what of Alfred. i personally like GK, and i'm wondering where this is going. i mean first with the guy who tried to blackmail Bruce (did he kill him and try to frame Bruce?) and then he cuts the batline. maybe Alfred has a kid and that's Hush. i mean stranger things have happened in comics.
|
|
|
|
Post by HUSH on Nov 13, 2005 11:18:38 GMT -5
I doubt that we won't at least see Mr J & Hush at some point during the Crisis. I hope we do...hopefully Hush is fleshed out during the Crisis, maybe his true identity revealed(I'm still not convinced he's Tommy, and that he is Harvey Dent)... |
|
|
|
Post by jlavaia on Nov 14, 2005 6:11:26 GMT -5
I doubt that we won't at least see Mr J & Hush at some point during the Crisis. I hope we do...hopefully Hush is fleshed out during the Crisis, maybe his true identity revealed(I'm still not convinced he's Tommy, and that he is Harvey Dent)... as much i want to see Harvey back around, Gotham Central # 33 shows us that it would be quite hard, as Harvey is shown in Arkham, still bald and not Two-Face. so if he really is Hush it would take some serious explaining, and not the while Harvey's in Arkham Hush is Clayface kind of explaination. and since the "Tommy Elliott" he was holding prisoner was a Clayface it could still be Tommy. i can't wait to get the definitive answer, this is one of the longest running mysteries in comics. we may just have to wait for Jeph Loeb to return Batman to find out though. |
|
|
|
Post by HUSH on Nov 14, 2005 13:12:05 GMT -5
I might not mind so much if it were Tommy, IF he had another motive, besides the one explained in HUSH, which would be a crappy, illogical motive if he were originally intended to be Tommy(which I don't believe is the case, regardless). If they said, "okay, he is Tommy, but here's his REAL motive," and that was a motive that made him a deep, 3-dimensional character, instead of a 1-dimensional S.O.B., I'd welcome him being Tommy. Even if it were revealed that he was lying to Batman in HUSH; that he wants revenge for his father's death the way Batman wants justice for his parents' deaths, that'd be cool too. But come on, he wants revenge for Bruce's father prolonging his recieving his inheritance? |
|
