|
Post by Blackgate on Oct 8, 2006 17:44:54 GMT -5
I would love to see all of them, but for that they would have to have a lot of sequals. I would like to see Robin introduced at the end of the second sequal as dick grayson. In the third, him become Robin and Barabra Gordon introduced. Then in the fourth have Robin storm away and go of to become Nightwing, Barabra would also become batgirl and get shot and at the end have Azrael, Huntress, and The Question introduced. The fifth, one, which i would like to see be the final, Nightwing returns and Oracle brings togeather all the vigilantes to fight a big battle (maybe a injustice gang of sorts). I would rather not see spoiler and i would only like to see Superman if it was a crossover movie.
Thats who i would like to see, but who would u guys like to see?
|
|
|
Post by All Star Batman on Oct 8, 2006 20:01:35 GMT -5
They definitely need to do Robin right. Schumacher screwed him up so much, they need to make him the way Dick Grayson is: a young boy whose parents were taken from him just like Bruce Wayne.
I'm going to have to say no to Superman in Nolan's movies, since they are taking the realistic approach this time.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Knight on Oct 8, 2006 20:03:21 GMT -5
For the Batman Begins trilogy, none. I like the solemn lone Dark Knight as is and think it would be better to just incorporate his whole story first in the whole trilogy instead of rbinging in an ally. Perhaps Robin, but not until the end. However, should the franchise continue, I'd love to see the Question in action.
|
|
|
Post by ??The Riddler?? on Oct 8, 2006 21:10:11 GMT -5
[shadow=green,left,300] I voted for Robin, I would love to see him in action. Like All Star said it would be nice to see his origin done by Nolan. Superman wouldn't be the best choice but he wuld be nice if Begins didn't have the realistic approach. [/shadow]
|
|
|
Post by Dark Nightwing on Oct 8, 2006 21:16:08 GMT -5
I want Nightwing, but way down the line after we have gotten Robin already.
One thing, it is spelled "Ally".
|
|
|
Post by Blackgate on Oct 8, 2006 21:19:54 GMT -5
One thing, it is spelled "Ally". hah thanks, im not the best speller..
|
|
Gravity06
Legions Of Gothamite
Iron Chef
Posts: 32
|
Post by Gravity06 on Oct 9, 2006 4:58:51 GMT -5
Huntress and/or Black Canary ... That way, we Birds of Prey fans will have a chance to see comic-faithful(?) live-action versions of two of our favorite leading ladies in their prime.
|
|
|
Post by HUSH on Oct 17, 2006 20:17:19 GMT -5
I also think that this trilogy needs to be Batman solo all the way through. I definitely don't think a bat-family would work, and Robin just wouldn't fit in this story, IMO. Nolan and Co. have started this off perfectly, and I think they need to keep doing it the same way. Besides, the only way I'd consider Robin even close to done right would be if he were about about 12-14 years old, and I can't see it being easy to find a kid that age with the acting talent and all the qualifications for Robin to pull it off. As for Superman, I wouldn't want to see a team up or anything, but a small cameo of Clark Kent might work. I'd love it if it was Tom Welling as adult reporter Clark, on assignment in Gotham, and he catches a glance of Batman doing his thing.
|
|
|
Post by Batlaw on Oct 17, 2006 20:27:30 GMT -5
Sadly I would have too hard of a time ever buying a 12year old live action Robin at all. One of those things (like yellow spandex) that although it works in comics, it wouldnt on film.
|
|
|
Post by HUSH on Oct 17, 2006 22:01:50 GMT -5
Sadly I would have too hard of a time ever buying a 12year old live action Robin at all. One of those things (like yellow spandex) that although it works in comics, it wouldnt on film. I understand. But I don't think an 18 year old Robin would be any more appealing or sensible. There are just to many problems and too much wrong with translating the idea of Robin to screen. I hope they don't risk the quality of a future movie and the success of the franchise just to bring Robin in. Fortunately, I believe Nolan has the sense not to do it.
|
|
|
Post by jvisbatty on Oct 20, 2006 20:22:56 GMT -5
Put me down as not wanting to see any allies in future Bat films. Personally I wouldn't mind the Commish getting a little more screen time - Gary Oldman could really add to this series. Maybe a little more Fox (Freeman) and Alfred (Caine) as well. Less of playboy Bruce.
|
|
|
Post by HUSH on Oct 21, 2006 15:03:14 GMT -5
Perhaps a bit less, as they've established the playboy act in Begins. But I think they should continue to show how important his whimsical public image is, to his secret identity. That's always necessary, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by All Star Batman on Oct 21, 2006 18:55:07 GMT -5
Perhaps a bit less, as they've established the playboy act in Begins. But I think they should continue to show how important his whimsical public image is, to his secret identity. That's always necessary, IMO. Very necessary.
|
|
|
Post by MuksC on Oct 25, 2006 8:37:50 GMT -5
i also don't want any allies in this trilogy. they should spend all 3 movies doing Batman properly, just working with Alfred, Fox and Gordon.
they rushed Robin into it in the first bunch of movies, then went crazy and brought in Batgirl, both not necessary in this new franchise, until the 4th or 5th films (if they REALLY MUST bring them in).
and Superman, definitely no way, but i like the idea of Clark the reporter possibly being there to write a story or something, only a very very small cameo though.
|
|
|
Post by Dark Nightwing on Oct 26, 2006 0:08:12 GMT -5
Well MuksC, I doubt we will get just a cameo. The studios want a big blockbuster, and the meeting of the two icons of Batman and Superman would draw a huge crowd. It will come, but not until after the trilogy.
|
|
|
Post by MuksC on Oct 26, 2006 7:58:14 GMT -5
but why does Superman have to be in a Batman movie, why can't it just be the reporter Clark Kent?
how on earth can Superman work in the new franchise of Batman, grounded in reality as it is?
Batman is just a rich guy with no superpowers, his villains are real men.
Superman is an alien from another planet who can fly, so how the heck could Superman work in the new Nolan Batman world?
they'll gone to all the trouble to make it grounded in reality, you can't then forget that and suddenly have a flying man teaming up with Batman, can you? it would be stupid.
both franchises are up and running well on their own, we don't need cheap gimmicks like teaming them up to make more money.
|
|
|
Post by Dark Nightwing on Oct 26, 2006 20:18:06 GMT -5
I'm not saying it is the smartest idea. Kent may have a cameo, but eventually we will get a Batman and Superman movie. There are hardcore Batman fans and hardcore Superman fans. A Batman/Superman movie will undoubtedly make a ton of money. Plus it has never been done before in the movies. And due to the combination of the franchises, I doubt that Nolan nor Singer will direct. Because it will be a blend, liberties will be taken. The real world will be limited to Gotham. WB sees the potential cash cow. Like it or not, things will have to change.
|
|
|
Post by MuksC on Oct 27, 2006 5:36:19 GMT -5
maybe 8 years ago when Batman was dead after B & R, and Superman hadn't been in a movie for many years it might have been viable.
but, in my opinion, both are doing fine on their own now, and surely they can make much more money doing both franchises properly but separately, than they can by combining them.
it would have to be a whole new franchise in which it's a fantasy world, totally separate from Begins and it's sequels.
i just don't see how it can happen as part of the Begins franchise (even in many years after Nolan has done his thing and gone), which is supposed to be realistic.
adding Superman into a Begins world would undo all the work Nolan an Co. did in making Begins what it is.
however a whole new franchise could work with more than 1 superhero, but i hope they don't do it in the future of Begins-style movies.
|
|
|
Post by Dark Nightwing on Oct 27, 2006 22:41:30 GMT -5
I can't see WB having a ton of stock in the real world universethat Nolan created. I think it is smarter to have both series revamped before co-starring the heroes. Public interest wouldn't be as high. As for the real world universe, I think of BTAS as a pretty realistic version, yet it still adapted well with the Superman and the JLU.
|
|